After the Trump administration repealed Obama-era net neutrality rules, advocates vowed to keep fighting. In 2019 the battle will be waged on three fronts — in federal court, by the states, and in Congress.
Billshark has long been an advocate of net neutrality, the principle that all Internet traffic should be treated equally. As you know, the Trump administration repealed rules put in place by the Obama administration to protect net neutrality.
Nevertheless, champions of the principle of net neutrality have vowed to keep fighting, and as The Washington Post put it this month:
“The battle over net neutrality is far from over.”
1 Why Net Neutrality Matters
Net neutrality means that the big Internet Service Providers (ISPs) must treat all web traffic that comes through their services equally. Under the Obama-era rules put in place by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 2015, they were not allowed to charge some websites or services more to ensure that their content would be delivered faster. Without regulations in place to prevent it, the behemoth telecom companies (Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, etc.) would be free to effectively throttle smaller ones, including start-ups, ultimately putting them out of business. Some of the more popular web companies weighing in on the side of net neutrality include Google, Facebook, Mozilla, Reddit, Tinder, Etsy, and TripAdvisor, among many others.
The concept of net neutrality is critical to maintaining fair access to all. For example, if large services such as Yelp or eBay were allowed to pay ISPs to have their sites delivered faster (known as “fast lanes” vs. “slow lanes,” or in the vernacular of the telecoms, “paid prioritization”), that would put smaller services and websites at a disadvantage, since they couldn’t afford to pay those fees.
Not only would their websites load more slowly, potentially frustrating visitors, but it would affect their ability to be found during Internet searches because search engines like Google give higher preference to sites that load quickly. Finally, the extra “pay to play” fees will eventually show up on users or consumers’ bills.
In a joint opinion piece on CNET, representatives Nancy Pelosi (CA), Frank Pallone, Jr. (NJ), and Mike Doyle (PA) wrote:
“Without the FCC acting as sheriff, it is unfortunately not surprising that big corporations have started exploring ways to change how consumers access the Internet in order to benefit their bottom line.”
2 Three Fronts: Courts, States, and Congress
But, as we said, activists haven’t given up. The battle in the coming year will be waged on three fronts: in federal court, by the states, and in Congress.
Attorneys general in 22 states and the District of Columbia have joined pro net neutrality consumer groups in suing the FCC to stop the repeal of net neutrality. Arguments in the case are scheduled to begin in the U.S Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit court next month.
The suit is based on the question of whether the FCC, under its Trump-appointed chairman Ajit Pai (a former lawyer for Verizon), had sufficient grounds to change the classification of broadband so soon after the 2015 rules were adopted, according to CNET.
Pai’s FCC transferred oversight of Internet service to another agency with relatively little experience in telecommunications policy, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). That creates a problem, critics say, because the FCC is empowered to act before harm to consumers occurs, while the FTC can only act after the fact. The FCC move also eliminated several consumer protections and barred states from enacting laws that contradict the FCC’s approach.
In addition, last year more than 30 states moved to implement net neutrality within their borders. California passed the most comprehensive legislation in the nation, which was to take effect this month. But in November the state reached an agreement with the Justice Department to put the law on hold pending the outcome of this case.
Meanwhile, in Congress, a bill to restore net neutrality failed late last month before the Democrats took control of the House of Representatives, and Chairman Pai released a statement thanking representatives for “declin[ing] to reinstate heavy-handed Internet regulation,” adding that “the FCC’s light-touch approach is working.” By “light touch” he meant deregulation.
As the tech website, ArsTechnica, pointed out, “Pai didn’t mention a recent case in which CenturyLink temporarily blocked its customers’ Internet access in order to show an ad or a recent research report accusing Sprint of throttling Skype (which Sprint denies).”
Pallone told ArsTechnica, “I question whether or not Chairman Pai understands how Congress works. ... The new Democratic majority will work to restore strong net neutrality rules in the House of Representatives this year.”
3 Premature Gloating
You may have seen some snarky online editorials popping up recently to the effect that “net neutrality is dead and the sky hasn’t fallen.” Of course not. Because the fight isn’t yet over, Big Broadband is on its best behavior—for the moment. But don’t let that fool you. If every option fails and net neutrality is eventually abolished, the giant ISPs will have a free hand, and that’s when you’ll see their true colors. Of course, by then it will be too late. Many consumer groups warn that the death of net neutrality “will be the end of the Internet as we know it.”
Billshark will continue to keep you up to date on this vital matter. In the meantime, let our sharks keep an eye on your bills, and find all the ways you’re being overcharged. We save our customers hundreds and often thousands of dollars a year.
Share:
Billshark · Bill Negotiation Experts Helping consumers and small businesses stop overpaying on recurring bills.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is net neutrality?
Net neutrality is the principle that all Internet traffic should be treated equally. It means big Internet Service Providers must treat all web traffic that comes through their services the same way. Under the Obama-era FCC rules adopted in 2015, providers were not allowed to charge some websites or services more to ensure their content would be delivered faster.
Why does net neutrality matter to consumers?
Without net neutrality, large telecom companies could create paid “fast lanes” and “slow lanes,” throttling smaller sites and start-ups that cannot afford the fees. Those sites would load more slowly, rank lower in search engines that favor fast-loading pages, and the extra “pay to play” fees would eventually show up on consumers’ bills.
On what three fronts will the net neutrality fight be waged in 2019?
According to the article, the battle will be waged on three fronts: in federal court, by the states, and in Congress. Attorneys general in 22 states and the District of Columbia are suing the FCC, more than 30 states moved to implement their own rules, and the new Democratic majority in the House plans to push to restore net neutrality.
What is the lawsuit against the FCC about?
Attorneys general in 22 states and the District of Columbia joined consumer groups in suing the FCC to stop the repeal of net neutrality. The suit questions whether the FCC, under Trump-appointed chairman Ajit Pai, a former Verizon lawyer, had sufficient grounds to change the classification of broadband so soon after the 2015 rules were adopted.
Why do advocates say it is premature to claim net neutrality is dead?
Because the fight isn’t over, Big Broadband is on its best behavior for the moment, so the sky hasn’t fallen yet. Advocates warn that if every option fails and net neutrality is abolished, the giant ISPs will have a free hand and show their true colors. Many consumer groups caution it would be the end of the Internet as we know it.
How the Net Neutrality Fight Will Be Waged in 2019 page context
How the Net Neutrality Fight Will Be Waged in 2019 is a Billshark resource with information and navigation relevant to recurring bills, consumer choices, and savings decisions.
Net neutrality faces a 2019 fight in courts, states, and Congress after the FCC repeal. Learn why it matters for your bills and Internet access.
Visitors can use this page to review Billshark information and continue to the route that best matches their savings, support, or account needs.
Billshark publishes this information to help visitors understand monthly expenses, provider choices, and practical next steps.
The page connects visitors with related Billshark resources when they need additional detail or a more specific next step.
After the Trump administration repealed Obama-era net neutrality rules, advocates vowed to keep fighting.
Billshark has long been an advocate of net neutrality , the principle that all Internet traffic should be treated equally.
Nevertheless, champions of the principle of net neutrality have vowed to keep fighting, and as The Washington Post put it this month.
Net neutrality means that the big Internet Service Providers (ISPs) must treat all web traffic that comes through their services equally.
The concept of net neutrality is critical to maintaining fair access to all.
Not only would their websites load more slowly.
In a joint opinion piece on CNET, representatives Nancy Pelosi (CA), Frank Pallone, Jr.
“Without the FCC acting as sheriff, it is unfortunately not surprising that big corporations have started exploring ways to change how consumers access the Internet in order to benefit their bottom line.”.
But, as we said, activists haven’t given up.
Attorneys general in 22 states and the District of Columbia have joined pro net neutrality consumer groups in suing the FCC to stop the repeal of net neutrality.
The suit is based on the question of whether the FCC.
Pai’s FCC transferred oversight of Internet service to another agency with relatively little experience in telecommunications policy, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
In addition, last year more than 30 states moved to implement net neutrality within their borders.
Meanwhile.
As the tech website.
Pallone told ArsTechnica, “I question whether or not Chairman Pai understands how Congress works.
You may have seen some snarky online editorials popping up recently to the effect that “net neutrality is dead and the sky hasn’t fallen.”.
Billshark will continue to keep you up to date on this vital matter.
Net neutrality is the principle that all Internet traffic should be treated equally.
Without net neutrality, large telecom companies could create paid “fast lanes” and “slow lanes,” throttling smaller sites and start-ups that cannot afford the fees.
According to the article, the battle will be waged on three fronts: in federal court, by the states, and in Congress.
Attorneys general in 22 states and the District of Columbia joined consumer groups in suing the FCC to stop the repeal of net neutrality.
Because the fight isn’t over, Big Broadband is on its best behavior for the moment, so the sky hasn’t fallen yet.
Billshark negotiates your bills for you — no savings, no fee.
Billshark helps lower internet, wireless, cable, satellite radio, and other monthly bills.
Our experts handle providers for customers and share updates throughout the process.
Customers pay only when Billshark finds savings on eligible bills.
1 Why Net Neutrality Matters.
2 Three Fronts: Courts, States, and Congress.
3 Premature Gloating.
Frequently Asked Questions.
What is net neutrality?.
Why does net neutrality matter to consumers?.
On what three fronts will the net neutrality fight be waged in 2019?.
What is the lawsuit against the FCC about?.
Why do advocates say it is premature to claim net neutrality is dead?.
Net Neutrality Isn't Dead Yet.
California Backs Net Neutrality: What's Next?.
Consumer Rights Under Threat: Mega-Corporations Win.
Will Trump's FCC Chair Neuter Net Neutrality?.
Net Neutrality: Latest Updates & Impact on Consumers.
22 States Fight for Net Neutrality and Internet Freedom.
7 Essential Facts About “Risk-Free” Trials & Hidden Costs.
Politics Net Neutrality Isn't Dead Yet Michel Mora · May 21, 2018 · 3 min read Read article →.
News California Backs Net Neutrality: What's Next?.
News Consumer Rights Under Threat: Mega-Corporations Win Carolyn Depoto · Oct 21, 2019 · 4 min read Read article →.
Politics Will Trump's FCC Chair Neuter Net Neutrality?.
News Net Neutrality: Latest Updates & Impact on Consumers Steven McKean · Nov 19, 2018 · 4 min read Read article →.
News 22 States Fight for Net Neutrality and Internet Freedom Carolyn Depoto · Jan 17, 2018 · 2 min read Read article →.
Savings Tips 7 Essential Facts About “Risk-Free” Trials & Hidden Costs Steven McKean · Jan 14, 2019 · 3 min read Read article →.
Internet 3 Ways Frontier Communications Overcharges Customers Michel Mora · Jan 16, 2019 · 2 min read Read article →.
Cable TV Price Locks: How Rates Can Rise Unexpectedly Steven McKean · Jan 9, 2019 · 2 min read Read article →.
See more posts for other categories ›.
Estimate My Savings.
College tuition articles.
Entertainment articles.
NerdWallet articles.
Shark Tank articles.
Social media articles.
Uncategorized articles.
Fairpoint bill savings.
Spectrum bill savings.
Terminix bill savings.
This resource helps readers connect a recurring-cost question with the Billshark information that provides the most relevant detail.
Visitors can review the available page sections, compare related topics, and continue to a more specific guide when they need additional context.
Billshark organizes service information and educational resources to make common household-bill decisions easier to research and understand.
The information on this page supports practical questions about providers, subscriptions, account actions, consumer choices, and monthly costs.
Readers can use the navigation and related resources to move from a broad question into focused information that matches their situation.
The page is intended to support informed decisions by pairing concise explanations with paths to deeper Billshark resources.
Relevant links help visitors compare options, understand recurring charges, and identify the next action that fits their current need.
Billshark content is designed to help consumers recognize recurring expenses and consider practical ways to manage them more effectively.
Visitors can return to this resource when they need to compare a new question with earlier information about services, bills, or savings.
The content connects everyday provider and subscription choices with broader guidance about monthly budgeting and household expenses.
Each page section contributes context that helps readers decide whether they need service guidance, account support, or an educational article.
Readers can use the available information to prepare questions, review options, and continue toward a useful next step at their own pace.
Billshark maintains connected resources so visitors can discover related guidance without losing the context of their original question.
The route supports research by making it easier to identify relevant details before choosing a provider, service, subscription, or account action.
Practical consumer information can help visitors understand why recurring charges change and which details are useful to review before responding.
The page brings together information that supports clearer conversations about bills, service choices, recurring expenses, and savings opportunities.
Visitors can use related resources to compare common terms, understand tradeoffs, and find the information that best fits their monthly-cost question.
Billshark guidance focuses on practical consumer decisions and helps readers move from general awareness into a more specific resource when needed.
The resource is part of a broader collection that connects household cost questions with provider information, support materials, and educational content.
Readers can explore the page before taking action, which helps them understand available options and identify the most relevant follow-up information.
The information is organized to support comparison, continued reading, and practical next steps without requiring visitors to search unrelated topics.
Recurring bills often involve provider rules, service terms, subscriptions, or account details, and this resource helps visitors locate useful context.
