A federal judge has cleared California to enforce its 2018 net neutrality law, blocking the broadband industry's bid to stop it. Here's what the ruling means for an open internet.
When we left off last, BILLSHARK was telling you about the previous administration’s apparent success in halting a 2018 California law designed to ensure net neutrality within its borders. (Net neutrality is the concept that Internet service providers [ISPs] should not be allowed to slow or block data based on content, or favor websites or video streams from firms that pay for preferential treatment.)
1 What California's Net Neutrality Law Does
California’s law goes farther than any other state has so far in attempting to ensure net neutrality within its borders. In addition to prohibiting ISPs from slowing or blocking websites or charging extra for priority service, the California law also prevented them from charging customers for exemptions to caps on their data use (known as zero-rating).
The U.S. Justice Department under President Trump filed suit to block the law when it was passed. The Trump administration did not favor net neutrality and in 2017 reversed Obama-era rules that implemented net neutrality nationwide. At the same time, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) barred states from enacting consumer protections in the area of net neutrality.
2 California Victorious in Court
Late last month, a federal judge in California’s Eastern District handed supporters of net neutrality a final victory. Lawmakers expect the case to impact net neutrality laws nationwide.
The broadband industry’s four main lobbying groups filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the law from taking effect. But judge John Mendez announced his ruling during a hearing. The docket noted his denial of the motion.
Industry groups had argued that a net neutrality law wasn’t necessary because they haven’t been blocking or throttling Internet traffic.
“I have heard that argument and I don’t find it persuasive,” he said, in remarks reported in The Hollywood Reporter. He noted the giant telecoms would naturally not engage in such practices while they awaited the outcome of the case.
“[That argument is] going to fall on deaf ears,” he said. “Everyone has been on their best behavior since 2018, waiting for whatever happened in the DC Circuit [court case of the FCC’s repeal of net neutrality]. I don’t place weight on the argument that everything is fine and we don’t need to worry.”
The court’s ruling effectively denied the lobbying groups’ request for a preliminary injunction to stop California from enforcing the 2018 law. The lawsuit against the law can continue. But Mendez will allow California to enforce net neutrality within its borders in the meantime.
3 Proponents Celebrate the Ruling
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra celebrated the ruling. “The ability of an Internet service provider to block, slow down, or speed up content based on a user’s ability to pay for service degrades the very idea of a competitive marketplace and the open transfer of information at the core of our increasingly digital and connected world,” he said in a statement.
Following Mendez’s decision, acting FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel likewise weighed in.
When the FCC, over my objection, rolled back its #netneutrality policies, states like California sought to fill the void with their own laws. Tonight a court in California decided that the state law can go into effect. This is big news for #openinternet policy.
California state Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) originally introduced the state’s net neutrality legislation. He, too, praised Mendez’s ruling in a statement. He called it a “huge victory for open access to the Internet, our democracy, and our economy.
“The Internet is at the heart of modern life,” he added. “We all should be able to decide for ourselves where we go on the Internet and how we access information. We cannot allow big corporations to make those decisions for us.”
4 The Fight Is Not Over
Unfortunately, don’t expect the giant telecoms—Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon, among others—to accept defeat so easily.
The trade groups that filed the suit said in a joint statement they “will review the court’s opinion before deciding on next steps.”
“A state-by-state approach to Internet regulation will confuse consumers and deter network investment, just as the importance of broadband for all has never been more apparent.”
And, of course, the original lawsuit against the California law continues. The Trump administration had supported the lawsuit. In February the Justice Department under the Biden administration formally withdrew its support.
Observers believe the suit ultimately has little chance of success.
Barbara van Schewick, a law professor at Stanford University who wrote one of the briefs supporting the law, released a statement saying in part, “The judge found that the law is on solid legal foundation and that the [Internet service providers] trying to overturn it are not likely to prevail.”
Referring to the FCC, she added, “The judge found, as I’ve long argued, that an agency that says it has no power to regulate, it has no power to tell others they can’t regulate.”
We’ll keep you updated as the situation warrants. Meanwhile, BILLSHARK can help you fight the broadband giants in your own small way. Let our professional negotiators deal with them, and help save money on your monthly bills. Remember, this service is free. You pay only if we can save you money.
Share:
Billshark · Bill Negotiation Experts Helping consumers and small businesses stop overpaying on recurring bills.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the federal judge decide about California's net neutrality law?
Judge John Mendez of California's Eastern District denied the broadband industry's motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the 2018 law from taking effect. The ruling allows California to enforce net neutrality within its borders while the underlying lawsuit against the law continues.
What is net neutrality?
Net neutrality is the concept that Internet service providers should not be allowed to slow or block data based on content, or favor websites or video streams from firms that pay for preferential treatment. The principle keeps access to the open internet equal for everyone.
What does California's net neutrality law prohibit?
California's law goes farther than any other state's. It prohibits ISPs from slowing or blocking websites or charging extra for priority service. It also prevents providers from charging customers for exemptions to caps on their data use, a practice known as zero-rating.
Why did the federal government oppose the California law?
The U.S. Justice Department under President Trump filed suit to block the law when it passed. The Trump administration did not favor net neutrality and in 2017 reversed Obama-era rules. The FCC also barred states from enacting their own net neutrality consumer protections.
Is the net neutrality fight over after this ruling?
No. The trade groups that filed the suit said they will review the court's opinion before deciding on next steps, and the original lawsuit against the California law continues. The Justice Department under the Biden administration withdrew its support in February, and observers believe the suit has little chance of success.
California Wins in Net Neutrality Fight page context
California Wins in Net Neutrality Fight is a Billshark resource with information and navigation relevant to recurring bills, consumer choices, and savings decisions.
A federal judge let California enforce its 2018 net neutrality law, blocking ISPs from throttling or zero-rating. See what the ruling means and save now.
Visitors can use this page to review Billshark information and continue to the route that best matches their savings, support, or account needs.
Billshark publishes this information to help visitors understand monthly expenses, provider choices, and practical next steps.
The page connects visitors with related Billshark resources when they need additional detail or a more specific next step.
A federal judge has cleared California to enforce its 2018 net neutrality law, blocking the broadband industry's bid to stop it.
When we left off last, BILLSHARK was telling you about the previous administration’s apparent success in halting a 2018 California law designed to ensure net neutrality within its borders.
California’s law goes farther than any other state has so far in attempting to ensure net neutrality within its borders.
The U.S.
Late last month, a federal judge in California’s Eastern District handed supporters of net neutrality a final victory.
The broadband industry’s four main lobbying groups filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the law from taking effect.
Industry groups had argued that a net neutrality law wasn’t necessary because they haven’t been blocking or throttling Internet traffic.
“[That argument is] going to fall on deaf ears,” he said.
The court’s ruling effectively denied the lobbying groups’ request for a preliminary injunction to stop California from enforcing the 2018 law.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra celebrated the ruling.
Following Mendez’s decision, acting FCC chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel likewise weighed in.
When the FCC, over my objection, rolled back its #netneutrality policies, states like California sought to fill the void with their own laws.
— Jessica Rosenworcel (@JRosenworcel) February 24, 2021.
California state Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) originally introduced the state’s net neutrality legislation.
“The Internet is at the heart of modern life,” he added.
Unfortunately, don’t expect the giant telecoms—Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon, among others—to accept defeat so easily.
The trade groups that filed the suit said in a joint statement they “will review the court’s opinion before deciding on next steps.”.
“A state-by-state approach to Internet regulation will confuse consumers and deter network investment, just as the importance of broadband for all has never been more apparent.”.
And, of course, the original lawsuit against the California law continues.
Observers believe the suit ultimately has little chance of success.
Barbara van Schewick.
Referring to the FCC, she added, “The judge found, as I’ve long argued, that an agency that says it has no power to regulate, it has no power to tell others they can’t regulate.”.
We’ll keep you updated as the situation warrants.
Judge John Mendez of California's Eastern District denied the broadband industry's motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the 2018 law from taking effect.
Net neutrality is the concept that Internet service providers should not be allowed to slow or block data based on content, or favor websites or video streams from firms that pay for preferential treatment.
California's law goes farther than any other state's.
No.
Billshark negotiates your bills for you — no savings, no fee.
Billshark helps lower internet, wireless, cable, satellite radio, and other monthly bills.
Our experts handle providers for customers and share updates throughout the process.
Customers pay only when Billshark finds savings on eligible bills.
1 What California's Net Neutrality Law.
2 California Victorious in Court.
3 Proponents Celebrate the Ruling.
4 The Fight Is Not Over.
Frequently Asked Questions.
What did the federal judge decide about California's net neutrality law?.
What is net neutrality?.
What does California's net neutrality law prohibit?.
Why did the federal government oppose the California law?.
Is the net neutrality fight over after this ruling?.
Net Neutrality Isn't Dead Yet | Billshark.
California Backs Net Neutrality: What's Next?.
Will Trump's FCC Chair Neuter Net Neutrality?.
How Much Should Internet Cost Per Month?.
3 Ways AT&T May Be Overcharging.
Net Neutrality: What the Ongoing Battle Means for.
FTC Refund Checks for AT&T Unlimited Plan Users.
Net Neutrality: Latest Updates & Impact on Consumers.
22 States Fight for Net Neutrality and Internet Freedom.
Save on the Bills You Just Read About.
All Negotiation Services.
Corporate / Business Billing.
Blog - All Categories.
professional negotiators.
Politics Net Neutrality Isn't Dead Yet | Billshark Michel Mora · May 21, 2018 · 3 min read Read article.
News California Backs Net Neutrality: What's Next?.
Politics Will Trump's FCC Chair Neuter Net Neutrality?.
Savings Tips How Much Should Internet Cost Per Month?.
Savings Tips 3 Ways AT&T May Be Overcharging You Brian Keaney · Oct 17, 2018 · 6 min read Read article.
Politics Net Neutrality: What the Ongoing Battle Means for You Michel Mora · Dec 18, 2017 · 3 min read Read article.
News FTC Refund Checks for AT&T Unlimited Plan Users Steven McKean · Feb 27, 2023 · 4 min read Read article.
News Net Neutrality: Latest Updates & Impact on Consumers Steven McKean · Nov 19, 2018 · 4 min read Read article.
News 22 States Fight for Net Neutrality and Internet Freedom Carolyn Depoto · Jan 17, 2018 · 2 min read Read article.
See more posts for other categories ›.
Estimate My Savings.
College tuition articles.
Entertainment articles.
NerdWallet articles.
Shark Tank articles.
Social media articles.
Uncategorized articles.
Fairpoint bill savings.
Spectrum bill savings.
Terminix bill savings.
This resource helps readers connect a recurring-cost question with the Billshark information that provides the most relevant detail.
Visitors can review the available page sections, compare related topics, and continue to a more specific guide when they need additional context.
Billshark organizes service information and educational resources to make common household-bill decisions easier to research and understand.
The information on this page supports practical questions about providers, subscriptions, account actions, consumer choices, and monthly costs.
Readers can use the navigation and related resources to move from a broad question into focused information that matches their situation.
The page is intended to support informed decisions by pairing concise explanations with paths to deeper Billshark resources.
Relevant links help visitors compare options, understand recurring charges, and identify the next action that fits their current need.
Billshark content is designed to help consumers recognize recurring expenses and consider practical ways to manage them more effectively.
Visitors can return to this resource when they need to compare a new question with earlier information about services, bills, or savings.
The content connects everyday provider and subscription choices with broader guidance about monthly budgeting and household expenses.
Each page section contributes context that helps readers decide whether they need service guidance, account support, or an educational article.
Readers can use the available information to prepare questions, review options, and continue toward a useful next step at their own pace.
Billshark maintains connected resources so visitors can discover related guidance without losing the context of their original question.
The route supports research by making it easier to identify relevant details before choosing a provider, service, subscription, or account action.
Practical consumer information can help visitors understand why recurring charges change and which details are useful to review before responding.
The page brings together information that supports clearer conversations about bills, service choices, recurring expenses, and savings opportunities.
